This BLOG serves the condo residents of our Village , WPB, FL. We attempt to provide accurate information but such information does not in any way constitute legal or professional advice. This Web Site is not censored, except in the case of extreme and offensive posts. As such, the posts are representative of the poster's opinion only. This BLOG cannot be held liable for actions arising from its use or for the contents of any externally linked pages.
7.22.2017
7.21.2017
7.18.2017
Brandless
I guess if I were stuck at home and running out of supplies I could try this https://brandless.com/
Reminiscent of Aldi, but you have to dig for size/weight if you really want to compare. New way shopping.
Reminiscent of Aldi, but you have to dig for size/weight if you really want to compare. New way shopping.
7.17.2017
Universal access to health services
British National Health Service (NHS)
Universal access to health services is a founding principle of the NHS.
The NHS has been judged the best, safest and most affordable healthcare system out of 11 countries analyzed and ranked by experts from the influential Commonwealth Fund health thinktank.
It is the second time in a row that the study, which is undertaken every three years, has found the UK to have the highest-rated health system.
The NHS has held on to the top spot despite the longest budget squeeze in its 69-year history, serious understaffing and the disruption caused by a radical restructuring of the service in England in 2013.
Its ranking is even more notable because the thinktank found the UK to put the fourth smallest amount of GDP into healthcare among the 11 countries. While the US spends 16.6% of its national income on health, the UK comes near the bottom, investing just 9.9%. Only New Zealand (9.4%), Norway (9.3%) and Australia (9%) put in less.
Universal access to health services is a founding principle of the NHS.
The NHS has been judged the best, safest and most affordable healthcare system out of 11 countries analyzed and ranked by experts from the influential Commonwealth Fund health thinktank.
It is the second time in a row that the study, which is undertaken every three years, has found the UK to have the highest-rated health system.
The NHS has held on to the top spot despite the longest budget squeeze in its 69-year history, serious understaffing and the disruption caused by a radical restructuring of the service in England in 2013.
Its ranking is even more notable because the thinktank found the UK to put the fourth smallest amount of GDP into healthcare among the 11 countries. While the US spends 16.6% of its national income on health, the UK comes near the bottom, investing just 9.9%. Only New Zealand (9.4%), Norway (9.3%) and Australia (9%) put in less.
etc. Read it all - https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/14/nhs-holds-on-to-top-spot-in-healthcare-survey
UK first, USA 11th7.16.2017
Best Gifts
Every week my family sends me a new picture of fresh cut flowers from their Mass. garden. FTD is out of business.
7.15.2017
New vocabulary
"Trumping" as in " When the TV is trumping you have to turn it off"
ie. excessive coverage and discussion of Trump family red herrings,
distractions, fake news, alternate facts, blunders, etc.
7.14.2017
7.13.2017
7.10.2017
Hearing Aids - 2 sides
Costly hearing aids nearly matched by inexpensive devices
Jul. 3rd, 2017
Those with hearing loss don’t have to pay thousands of dollars to get effective relief, according to a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Personal sound amplifiers purchased over the counter can perform nearly as well in improving speech understanding as hearing aids costing five times as much, the study found. It can be read at j.mp/heaids.
Hearing aids can only be purchased in the United States from a licensed professional. They cost an average of $4,700 for two devices, which are not covered by Medicare, the study stated.
Personal sound amplifiers cannot legally be sold to help the hearing-impaired, but are sometimes used for that purpose. The expense of professional hearing aids places them out of reach of many people.
Hearing specialists have said some of these sound amplification devices are being sold inappropriately as a hearing corrective.
The study suggests an alternative, which is to set up a new regulatory category for over-the-counter hearing devices that meet specifications.
Researchers led by Nicholas S. Reed of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine compared one hearing aid, which costs $1,910, to five personal sound amplifiers, costing from $350 to $30.
The devices were tested by 42 adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. The subjects had an average age of 72, and two-thirds were women.
All testing was performed in a sound booth by an audiologist, the study said. The testers were presented with a “moderately difficult listening environment,” with sentences delivered by a speaker directly in front of the subjects, while speech babble was projected directly behind the subjects.
“The mean unaided accuracy was 76.5 percent,” the study stated. “The hearing aid improved speech understanding accuracy to 88.4 percent for an absolute improvement difference of 11.9 percentage points.”
Three of the personal sound amplifiers improved speech understanding to within 5 percentage points of the hearing aid. One device produced little improvement, and the fifth actually decreased speech understanding.
Limitations of the study include the modest number of participants, and testing with a small sample of hearing technologies, it stated.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)