A
small group (yeah, them again) would have you believe that the
Delegate Assembly Oct 4th voted against the UCO Budget because they
were against WiFi. Nonsense, the majority are for WiFi, but we have
many factions and agendas.
Some
voted against the Budget because:
- They believed Treasurer became illegal when she moved out of CV
- They wanted $1 for PRPC (golf)
- They want to show President they have power (yeah, them again)
- They are suing UCO
- The Treasurer voted against her own budget
- $2 was not enough for WiFi
- $2 was too much for WiFi
- They were confused by WiFi
- The motion was introduced too rapidly
Any
ideas to move us ahead?
Considering the the Treasurer is really not qualified to hold office, then of course she will vote against her own budget. It matters not now, budget has passed, now they will concentrate on trying to bring back term limits. When and if it gets defeated again, they will just start all over and we will keep hearing their drivel every couple of months, which does nothing but slow the progress of REAL village business. That seems to be the goal. If they can slow progress to a crawl, then they will say that UCO is doing a bad job. Stupidity at it's best.
ReplyDelete